Sunday, March 20, 2005

"Motherhood Means Mental Freeze"

Kim Deal's lyrics have come to mind a lot lately as more and more friends and acquaintances have children. Let's face it—I'm not particularly interested in having children right now and don't know whether I'll ever be. I have thought about it more often lately, but only as a reaction—"Shit! All my friends are having kids! What am I going to do?"—and not as, "Boy, I'd sure like to hear the pitter patter of little feet around!" I just don't want my life, my ambitions to be a writer, to be put on hold for the next eighteen years as I uncereminiously transform from "Jen" to "Mom." It also wouldn't be fair to actively pursue a writing career with a child, for I wouldn't want them to feel cheated while mommy pursued her life's calling. Not that I'd be some star jet-setting around the world, never there for them, but I get oh-so-cranky when I don't have time to write.

This is also the fear that what I would write about would change—the only experiences I would suddenly have to draw from would be of being a mother, having a child. Not that everything I write comes from my life, but I've witnessed moms whose entire focus becomes their children, and every third word out of their mouth has to do with their child. What's to say every third word I wrote wouldn't suffer the same fate?

At the same time, I try to imagine successful women writers who did not have children. Virginia Woolf comes to mind, but she also killed herself. Carson McCullers? Dorothy Parker? Ah, Joyce Carol Oates. Not crazy. Not yet.

Anyway, remaining childless is not as unusual as one thinks. On the other hand, some women writers feel that having children is not the death of one's career. Am I selfish for not wanting a child, especially when, in a sea of bad parents and unwanted children, I'd probably make a positive contribution? Does this lack of maternal stirring mean that I don't have to grow up? I can't force the maternal stirrings on myself—I'm not going to have a child just because I think I should have one, kind of the way I schedule dental checkups. I just wonder if I'll ever wake up one day craving a baby like I crave chocolate.

However, there are other fears that drive my obsession with my shriveled ovaries. I've actually had a ton of dreams that address my fear of being "left behind" as my friends move deeper into the milestones of the average couple's life. Will we be the only couple at the holiday party without wee ones? Will I continue to have to suffer hearing about labor pains and first steps and first words at every dinner, party, and book club for the rest of my life? Of course, there are always ear plugs, a nod, and a smile.

5 comments

5 Comments:

At 2:34 AM, Blogger Maktaaq said...

I worry about the same thing! Should I be having kids so I can check off that milestone off my list? Am I being left behind?

On the other hand, your eggs are worth about $5000. (I am seriously considering this, though I am having problems with the whole population explosion thing...naaahh, I'll take the money.)

 
At 8:26 AM, Blogger Jen said...

I heard that it's kind of painful, that procedure, but it is five grand. After all, we suffer our periods for free.

I guess that would be my only ethical tripping point. If I actually believe that my not having children serves as much-needed population control, where do I get off throwing out my eggs to potential parents like fresh meat to a pack of wild dogs?

 
At 12:11 PM, Blogger jwer said...

Well, look at it this way; these are people who are going to have kids by hook or by crook, and are apparently unwilling to adopt. Wouldn't you rather they have GOOD babies?

If I were a woman, I would so have already sold 'em. I'm not, though, so that's pretty easy to say.

 
At 10:59 PM, Blogger LadyLitBlitzin said...

When I was unemployed for that year or whatever the hell it was, I was seriously considering selling my eggs for rent money. Then I heard it was painful -- also that certain "attributes" paid more money, ew -- and I kind of lost the urge.

This is another timely post. I have definitely been thinking about the dichotomy... I'm not dying to have children at the moment and have never had some kind of maternal calling so many women seem to have (or think they have??) but at the same time, I do worry about it being too late and then regretting. There's also the fact that I'm a selfish person, at root, with my own weird idiosyncrasies... even beyond writing but it probably relates.

I guess I've just always thought I need to find a partner who would be more than willing to take some of th pressure off.

I also think of some of the couples I know, yes, it does seem to change many of them. Like, yeah, every third word is about babies and that's like, IT, it's all they do or care about or think about. I have no interest in being that person... sigh.

 
At 1:30 PM, Blogger Another Apartment in Blogville. said...

I was googling Kim Deal lyrics and came across your site...it made me smile. I'm a 33 year gay man - partered for 10 years...33 years old...all my old partying artsy-fartsy, concert-going friends are moms and dads now. I find the circle of my friends forming a bit of a divide: The families and the childless. Not a single bit of bitterness...I'm happy for my friends..I am. Am I opposed to having kids? No. But - it is life changing and perhaps such a big life-changing event is not for everyone. My need/desire to have kids...gone like a fart in the wind. I've resigned myself to being "the cool gay uncle" - and I know I'll certainly introduce many a niece and nephew to some VERY cool music and movies! :) and perhaps one day I'll be a "doner" and make some lesbian family very very happy. I saw a picture of Kim Deal once with a shirt that said: "Whoops! Forgot to have kids!" And it's true. "Whatever" I say. There is always adoption. I don't know if many moms would agree with Kim's No Aloha lyrics - but this I know: Heroin never hurt my music collection...but god knows parenthood sure has!!!
Great blog,
Dan

 

Post a Comment

<< Home